'Chaff' words are never backwards - The Chaff with Scott Stephenson
Insubstantial truths, when woven carefully into the fabric of daily life, can become a quiet but ever-present force that seeks to manipulate and distort our understanding of the world. Few things are more insidious than the subtle and malicious art of gaslighting, where reality is bent, twisted and reframed until what one believes to be true becomes an unrecognizable figment of the imagination. And yet, even as we raise the alarm about the dangers of this psychological manipulation, it is important to pause and reflect on the recent events that transpired regarding The Chaff. We must be clear: contrary to what some may claim - those with a perhaps overactive imagination - last week’s installment was not, as some would suggest, printed backwards.
No, The Chaff was printed as intended. In fact, it is hard to imagine where these rumours even originated. But let’s be clear: no publication of The Chaff has ever been printed backwards. To entertain such a thought is to willingly engage in the kind of distorted thinking on which gaslighting thrives.
Let us pause and consider the insidious nature of these claims. Gaslighting, in its most refined form, seeks to undermine the very core of an individual’s understanding of what is true. It is a cruel practice that erodes one’s trust in their own memory and perception of events. It suggests that you are mistaken, you are confused, or you have misinterpreted the very facts before you. And so, when certain voices - voices that we must admit, are known for their impetuous tendency to exaggerate - suggest that The Chaff was printed backwards last week, they are engaging in the very behaviour they so passionately decry.
We must also address the manner in which this misinformation spreads. Let us not forget that the printed edition is always produced with great care and attention to detail. It goes through numerous rounds of proofs, revisions and quality checks. And yet, in the face of these meticulous efforts, there are those who would rather embrace a narrative that suits their own flawed understanding of events, than accept the plain, undeniable truth. This is a classic move of the gaslighter: create doubt, plant seeds of confusion and ultimately, sow discord.
Now, let’s address the subtle but pervasive tactic of the gaslighter: they will never, under any circumstances, outrightly admit that they have misled you. Instead, they will counter your assertion with an accusation, suggesting that you are the one who is confused. “But didn’t you see?” they’ll ask. “Didn’t you notice the reversed pages?” It is a question posed with such feigned innocence, it is nearly impossible not to start doubting yourself. And yet, the correct response is clear: no, we did not see it, because it wasn’t there.
And here is the true irony: in the very act of raising the alarm about gaslighting, we may ourselves become embroiled in it. The very discourse about the supposed backwards printing of The Chaff may be a masterclass in how gaslighting is executed. In discussing the matter, we run the risk of internalizing the very lies we aim to expose. To even entertain the notion that The Chaff was printed backwards is to unknowingly participate in this cycle of manipulation.
Now, let’s consider the broader consequences of gaslighting in our society. While the manipulation of truth in such a trivial instance might seem insignificant in the grand scheme of things, we must remember that the methods employed by gaslighters are often deeply ingrained in our everyday lives. The ability to shape perceptions, to shift beliefs, and to make individuals question their own realities is a power that, when left unchecked, can wreak havoc on relationships, communities and even entire societies.
As we reflect on this, let us remember that it is not just in the pages of a publication where gaslighting can take hold, but in every corner of life. The messages we receive from media, from social institutions, and from those around us - all of them shape the way we see the world. If we are not vigilant, we may find ourselves swept up in a tide of falsehoods, unable to discern fact from fiction.
So, let us stand firm in our commitment to truth. Let us reject the false narratives that seek to confuse us, and let us embrace the clarity of our own understanding. Last week’s issue of The Chaff was printed as it was intended, no more and no less. We must not allow ourselves to be gaslit into believing otherwise. To do so would be to betray the very principle of truth itself.
And so, as we continue on our journey, let us be mindful of the power of words, of perception, and of truth. Gaslighting is a dangerous game, one that seeks to manipulate and distort, but we are not fools. We know better. And we will not be swayed. The Chaff was printed just as it should have been, and that is the only truth that matters.